How we calculate

Official data, simple maths, honest limits.

Last updated September 2026.

SourcePublisherWhat we use it for
UCAS End of Cycle 2025UCASOffer rates by university and subject (applications and offers, England, age 18)
Discover Uni and HESA dataOffice for Students / HESACourse list, subject groups, entrant grade profiles
POLAR4 and TUNDRAOffice for StudentsArea participation measures behind contextual offers
University course pagesEach universityTypical offers and required subjects, read September 2026
OfferCheck student reportsOfferCheckOffers students reported to us (offers only). Used to adjust for how your grades compare with the offer

Each number on a course page names its source and year.

  • LikelyRoughly an even chance of an offer or better (50% or more).
  • PossibleBetween about 1 in 5 and 1 in 2 (20% to 50%).
  • ReachLess than about 1 in 5. Also used for any course with an interview or admissions test, because grades only get you into the room.
  • Not enough dataWe have neither an offer rate nor a typical offer we trust, so we do not guess.

We never show a per-course percentage. A band is a range, because the data cannot support more.

  1. Start from the offer rate. The share of applicants (England, age 18) who got an offer for that subject at that university in UCAS 2025. If a university has fewer than 20 applications, we use the national rate for the subject.
  2. Compare your grades with the typical offer. The gap is counted in grades (8 UCAS points each). Our student-reported offers show how much the odds move for each grade above or below the offer. Contextual students are compared with the contextual offer where one exists.
  3. Combine your choices. The chance of no offers blends two cases: every choice missing out independently, and one shared setback (like missing your grades) hitting all five at once. We show it as “about 1 in N”, rounded, and cap any single choice at 97%.
  4. Swaps. We try replacing one choice with another course in the same subject group and show the swap only if it clearly lowers the chance of no offers.

Independence is a simplification: in reality a weak application hurts you everywhere. Treat the figure as a guide, not a forecast.

  • High: a university-level offer rate from at least 100 applications, a verified or well-supported typical offer, and your grades comparable with it.
  • Medium: at least two of those three inputs.
  • Low: one input, a typical offer found by web search, or a fallback to the overall offer rate only.
  • Interviews and admissions tests. Oxford, Cambridge, medicine, dentistry and veterinary courses select on more than grades. We cap them below Likely and say so.
  • Typical offers. Some universities do not publish one, or publish a range. We mark those lower confidence or show “see university site”.
  • Other qualifications. A-levels and the IB are compared directly. BTEC, Scottish Highers and others fall back to the overall offer rate with low confidence.
  • Contextual offers. Eligibility rules differ by university. We use them only where a university publishes one.
  • Past cycles. Offer rates describe 2025 applicants. Courses change, and so can demand.
  • Student reports. Offers reported to us come from students who chose to share them, so they are not a random sample.

Found a mistake? Tell us and we will check the source.